The strongest leader I knew became a shell of herself trying to fix things that were never hers to fix.
I watched it happen slowly, then all at once. She’d go into meetings armed with data, research, and perfect arguments for why we needed to protect public safety. She’d present clear, ethical solutions that any reasonable person would support.
And she’d leave those meetings defeated, convinced she just hadn’t made the case clearly enough.
So she’d work harder. Research more. Craft better arguments. Spend weekends perfecting presentations that should have been slam dunks.
But here’s what I can see now that I couldn’t see then: She wasn’t the problem. The system was designed to resist exactly what she was trying to do.
THE PATTERN REVEALED
Since stepping back from my role as a registration manager, I’ve had the uncomfortable privilege of seeing this pattern everywhere. It started when I reflected on my own experience — all those times I blamed myself for not being persuasive enough, smart enough, strategic enough to make change happen.
Then I saw it in my former boss, one of the most competent leaders I’ve ever worked with. Instead of recognizing that the system was broken, she kept taking personal responsibility for not being able to fix it.
And then I saw it in every people-first leader I respected: directors, managers, senior executives who could see problems months before they became crises, but somehow convinced themselves they were failing because they couldn’t single-handedly transform dysfunctional systems.
The pattern is this: People-first leaders keep taking personal responsibility for systems-level issues.
WHAT THIS LOOKS LIKE IN REAL LIFE
You present a policy that would protect public safety, and it gets buried in bureaucracy or discussions about how the organization doesn’t have the time or resources to do something new. Instead of recognizing that the system rewards politics over safety, you think: “I must not have made a strong enough case.”
You watch good people leave because of toxic management, and instead of acknowledging that the organization doesn’t actually want to address toxicity, you think: “I should have found a way to make them stay.”
You see the same preventable crisis happen for the third time, and instead of calling out the fact that leadership ignores early warnings, you think: “I need to find better ways to communicate urgency.”
You spend your nights rewriting emails in your head as you fight sleep thinking that if you just find the magic words people care about ethics and will make the right choices. You research more data, craft more compelling arguments, perfect your presentation style.
But here’s the thing: You’re trying to solve a systems problem with personal perfection.
WHY WE DEFAULT TO SELF-BLAME:
It’s actually easier to blame ourselves than to acknowledge the truth: some systems are designed to resist the changes we’re trying to make.
Self-blame gives us a sense of control. If it’s our fault, then we can fix it by being better. If it’s the system, then… what? How do you fix something that’s working exactly as designed?
Self-blame also protects us from a harder truth: that the people in power might not actually want what’s best for public safety, or staff wellbeing, or ethical operations. They might genuinely prioritise politics over protection, image over integrity.
That’s a terrifying realization for people-first leaders who entered their roles believing that everyone, deep down, wants to do the right thing.
THE REAL COST
But here’s what happens when people-first leaders take on personal responsibility for systems-level dysfunction:
They work themselves into the ground. Sixty-hour weeks trying to compensate for institutional failure. Weekends spent crafting presentations that should be unnecessary. Energy poured into problems they don’t have the authority to actually solve.
They lose their confidence. When your best efforts consistently fail, you start questioning your judgment, your competence, your worth. Leaders who should be trusted advisors become second-guessing disasters.
They burn out. Not from hard work — people-first leaders don’t mind hard work. They burn out from fighting upstream every single day with no progress to show for it.
They leave. And when they do, the system loses its strongest voices for change. The people who could have been part of the solution remove themselves because they’ve been convinced they’re the problem.
The most devastating thing I’ve witnessed? Watching strong, confident leaders become shells of themselves because they’re carrying weight that was never theirs to carry. Leaders who should be shaping policy become afraid to speak up. Experts who should be trusted advisors start doubting their own expertise.
THE SHIFT THAT CHANGES EVERYTHING
The question isn’t “What did I do wrong?”
The question is “What’s broken here?”
When you stop taking personal responsibility for systems-level dysfunction, you can start seeing clearly:
- That policy didn’t fail because you didn’t argue well enough. It failed because the decision was made before you walked into the room.
- Those people didn’t leave because you failed to convince them to stay. They left because the system is toxic and leadership won’t address it.
- That crisis didn’t happen because you didn’t communicate urgency effectively enough. It happened because early warnings are consistently ignored.
This isn’t about lowering your standards or giving up on change. This is about correctly diagnosing the problem so you can respond strategically instead of reactively.
This is about recognising that your integrity isn’t the problem. Your expertise isn’t insufficient. Your leadership isn’t lacking.
The system is broken. And that’s not your personal responsibility to fix.
WHAT BECOMES POSSIBLE:
When people-first leaders stop absorbing systems-level dysfunction as personal failure, everything changes:
You stop spending your energy trying to convince people who don’t want to be convinced, and start focusing that energy on people and situations where change is actually possible.
You stop rewriting emails seventeen times and start speaking with the authority that your expertise has earned.
You stop second-guessing your judgment and start trusting the expertise that got you into leadership in the first place.
You stop working harder to compensate for institutional failure and start working strategically to navigate or transform broken systems.
Most importantly: you remember why you chose this work in the first place. Not to manage dysfunction, but to create change. Not to absorb toxicity, but to build something better.
THE INVITATION
If you’re a people-first leader who’s been carrying the weight of systems-level problems as personal failures, this is your permission slip to put it down.
You are not responsible for fixing what you didn’t break.
You are not failing because broken systems resist your solutions.
You are not the problem. You never were.
But you might be the solution — if you can stop blaming yourself long enough to see what’s really broken and respond accordingly.
The strongest leaders know the difference between what’s theirs to carry and what’s theirs to change. It’s time you learned that difference too.
You Don’t Have to Figure This Out Alone
If you’ve read this far, you’re probably having that uncomfortable moment of recognition: “This is exactly what I’ve been doing.”
You’ve been carrying weight that was never yours to carry. Taking responsibility for systems-level problems that you don’t have the authority to fix. Blaming yourself for the dysfunction of broken institutions.
Now comes the harder question: What do you do with this awareness?
This is where most people-first leaders get stuck. You can see that the system is the problem, but you still have to work within it. You still have to navigate the politics, manage the dysfunction, try to create change without losing yourself in the process.
That’s exactly what we explore in a Systems Crisis Assessment.
It’s 75 minutes to map what you’re really dealing with — not your feelings about it (though those matter), but the actual system dynamics that are creating impossible choices for ethical leaders like you.
By the end of our time together (and with a customized Systems Crisis Assessment Report), you’ll have:
- Clear diagnosis of what’s broken and why
- Recorded regulation practices and nervous system tools for your specific situation,
- Concrete next steps that honour your values and your reality for
- Quick-reference crisis navigation tools you can return to whenever you need to find your leadership footing again
This isn’t therapy (I’m not a therapist). This isn’t life coaching. This is diagnostic work for leaders who need to understand the system they’re navigating before they can decide how to respond to it.
Ready to stop carrying what was never yours to carry?
This is for leaders ready to move from “I know something’s wrong” to “I understand what I’m dealing with and what my choices are.”
Learn more about the Systems Crisis Assessment or Book Your Assessment.
comments +